<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
>

<channel>
	<title>Derek Neighbors &#187; housing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derekneighbors.com/tag/housing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derekneighbors.com</link>
	<description>Musings of a Mad Man (@dneighbors)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:42:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So What Exactly Is Keeping You In Your Current Mortgage?</title>
		<link>http://derekneighbors.com/2009/11/so-what-exactly-is-keeping-you-in-your-current-mortgage/</link>
		<comments>http://derekneighbors.com/2009/11/so-what-exactly-is-keeping-you-in-your-current-mortgage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Neighbors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derekneighbors.com/?p=6129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bailout had it all wrong.  It attempted to fix problems in the system by letting the very people that got us in trouble apply the fix, THE BANKS.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think everyone who has over extended [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/12/the-economist-the-obama-a_n_355022.html">bailout had it all wrong</a>.  It attempted to fix problems in the system by letting the very people that got us in trouble apply the fix, THE BANKS.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think everyone who has over extended themselves, put themselves in a fully leveraged position and made poor debt decisions have a part to own up to.  It was however the banks that put people in a position to make poor choices, in the name of their own greed.</p>
<p>I have talked to several people around town and hear a common scenario.  Buyers are under water.  Not because they bought a $300,000 home when they could only afford $240,000, but because they bought a $300,000 home they could afford that is now simply worth $180,000.  The $60,000 they put down as good borrowers (20%) is completely lost.  On top of that they are in the hole an additional $60,000 of equity.  They can make the monthly payment no problem as they had always intended to.</p>
<p>So what is the problem?  The problem is that their current house payment is $1600/mo, but they can rent the identical house in their same neighborhood for $800/mo.  That is a difference of $800/mo or $9600/year in cash flow.  The chances that in the next 7 years the equity of the house will rise by $60,000 to get them above water is virtually none.  So why on earth is the borrower staying in this home?  To save their credit score is a likely answer.  You have to ask if someone said they would pay you $67,200 in cash and relieve $120,000 in unsurmountable debt to ruin your credit score for 7 years would you take it?</p>
<p>The above person might qualify for the Obama 125% refinance plan, but at best that might only make their payment $1300/mo.  Not to mention that the <a href="http://cop.senate.gov/reports/library/report-100909-cop.cfm">banks are not just making the refinances happen</a>.  They refuse to live up to their side of the bailout.  If instead a plan was in place to f<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/05/opinion/05geanokoplos.html?_r=1">orce lenders to readjust principle balances </a>(not interest rates) to a point where the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200943/200943abs.html">home owner was not completely underwater</a> then perhaps the home owner might full well consider staying in their home.  At this point, I think someone in the above situation has NO SENSIBLE reason to stay in the home.  They have far more to gain crushing their credit and <a href="http://www.foreclosurepulse.com/blogs/mainblog/archive/2009/10/29/foreclosures-spread-to-middle-class.aspx">walking away</a>.  Taking the positive cash flow and investing in their future.  If the bank were in the home owners situation they would certainly walk away.  It&#8217;s a business decision.  Sounds cold, but the current bailout isn&#8217;t helping much of anyone.  If we are going to throw money at the problem at least lets be pragmatic about it.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts?<br />
<!--more--><!-- BlogGlue Cache: No --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://derekneighbors.com/2009/11/so-what-exactly-is-keeping-you-in-your-current-mortgage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

